Archive

  • Moral Objectivity or Misattribution? A Critique of Enoch’s Claim About Moral Discourse

    Do we really believe in objective morality — or are we just misreading our emotions? David Enoch argues that our moral discourse reveals a hidden commitment to moral objectivism. In this post, I challenge that view, suggesting instead that our moral convictions may stem from cultural habits and emotional responses… Read more…

  • Ideas within a Purely Physical Ontology: A Solution to Quine’s Pegasus Problem

    Quine’s famous Pegasus problem illustrates a central philosophical challenge: How can we meaningfully talk about something that does not exist, such as the mythical horse Pegasus, without ontologically committing ourselves to its existence? Read more…

  • A short reflection on The Harm Principle by John Stuart Mill

    A brief reflection on John Stuart Mill’s harm principle and its limits. Can a society built only on preventing harm to others still allow troubling acts, like consensual duels? This text explores where the principle becomes unclear. Read more…

Categories

By language

English (9) Swedish (3)

Monthly archive